All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. 

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

BE BOLD phase IIIb: Bimekizumab vs risankizumab for active PsA

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Jun 29, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in psoriatic arthritis.


Updated results from the phase IIIb, head-to-head, multicenter, randomized, double-blind BE BOLD trial (NCT06624228), evaluating bimekizumab vs risankizumab in adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), were presented by Joseph F. Merola at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2026 Congress, June 3–6, 2026, London, UK. Patients were randomized 1:1 to bimekizumab (n = 277) or risankizumab (n = 276); eligible patients were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve or had inadequate response/intolerance to a maximum of one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), with tender joint count ≥3/68 and swollen joint count ≥3/66. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at Week 16. 

Key data: ACR50 at Week 16 was achieved by 49.1% with bimekizumab vs 38.0% with risankizumab (difference, 11.1%; p = 0.0058); Week 24 rates were 54.9% vs 43.8%, respectively. ACR50 was also higher with bimekizumab vs risankizumab at Week 4 (19.9% vs 7.2%; nominal p < 0.0001). Minimal disease activity (MDA) at Week 16 was numerically higher with bimekizumab (43.3% vs 39.9%; p = 0.3921), with Week 24 rates of 49.1% vs 42.4%. In patients with baseline body surface area (BSA) ≥3%, ACR50 + Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% response (PASI100) was numerically higher with bimekizumab vs risankizumab at Week 16 (33.5% vs 24.4%; nominal p = 0.0800). Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis low disease activity + remission (DAPSA LDA + REM) was also numerically higher with bimekizumab through Week 24. Safety was comparable, with no new safety signals identified; Candida infections were more frequent with bimekizumab and were all mild/moderate.  

Key learning: BE BOLD provides the first head-to-head biologic evidence demonstrating the superiority of bimekizumab over risankizumab for a joint-focused endpoint in PsA. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making for the management of PsA.  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content