All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III POETYK PsA-2 trial: Deucravacitinib in PsA

By Megan Moore

Share:

Aug 17, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in psoriatic arthritis.


Results from the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III POETYK PsA-2 trial (NCT04908189), evaluating deucravacitinib in 729 adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had an inadequate/loss of response or intolerance to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and/or prior exposure to and/or failure or intolerance to TNF inhibitors (TNFis), were published in Arthritis & Rheumatology by Mease et al. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in response (ACR20) at Week 16.  

Key data: At Week 16, a greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib vs placebo achieved ACR20 (54.2% vs 39.4%; p = 0.0002). ACR20 response rates continued to increase through Week 28 and were maintained through Week 52 in those who received deucravacitinib throughout the study (62.2%) and in those who switched from placebo to deucravacitinib at Week 16 (67.3%). At Week 16, a greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib vs placebo also achieved ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75; p < 0.0001) and minimal disease activity (MDA; p = 0.0007). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 1.9%, 1.0%, and 3.8% of patients receiving deucravacitinib, placebo, and apremilast (safety reference arm), respectively, with no new safety signals reported through Week 52. 

Key learning: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior, durable efficacy vs placebo in patients with PsA and was well tolerated through 52 weeks, supporting its role as an oral treatment option for patients who have an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapies and/or prior exposure to or failure with/intolerance to TNFis. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content