All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The pso Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the pso Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The pso and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is supported by educational grants. All educational content is developed independently by SES in collaboration with our expert steering committee, with no input or influence from financial supporters. We would like to express our gratitude to the following companies for their support: • UCB: For website development, launch, and ongoing maintenance. • UCB: For educational content and news updates.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

APEX phase IIIb trial Week 24 results: Inhibition of structural damage progression in PsA with guselkumab

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jul 18, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in psoriatic arthritis.


 

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogenous, inflammatory disease resulting in structural damage that affects patient HRQoL. Guselkumab is a dual-acting mAb indicated for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and active PsA. Early findings from DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285) have demonstrated less radiographic progression with guselkumab vs placebo.

During the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2025 Congress, Philip Mease presented findings through Week 24 (W24) from the phase IIIb APEX trial (NCT04882098) assessing the efficacy and safety of guselkumab vs placebo in the inhibition of structural damage progression in PsA.1

Patients who were biologic-naïve and had active PsA for ≥6 months, along with ≥2 erosive joints on hand/foot radiographs were included (N = 1,020). Eligible patients were randomized to receive guselkumab 100 mg SC Q4W (n = 273), guselkumab 100 mg SC Q8W (n = 371), or placebo (n = 376). The primary endpoint was ACR20 response at W24. Key secondary endpoints included mean change in total PsA-modified vdH-S score at W24.

 

Key learnings

The primary endpoint was met; guselkumab Q4W and Q8W demonstrated a higher ACR20 response rate vs placebo at W24 (66.6% vs 68.3% vs 47.0%; p < 0.001). Guselkumab vs placebo also achieved higher ACR50 and ACR70 response rates (p < 0.001 each).

Guselkumab Q4W and Q8W had a lower total PsA-modified vdH-S score vs placebo (0.55 vs 0.54 vs 1.35, respectively; p = 0.002). Guselkumab demonstrated a lower erosion score (p = 0.002) and JSN score (p = 0.025) vs placebo. 

At W24, a higher proportion of patients in the guselkumab group demonstrated a change in PsA-modified vdH-S score ≤0.5 (p = 0.007), PASI 90 (p < 0.001), and HAQ-DI (p < 0.001) vs the placebo group.

Guselkumab did not demonstrate any new safety signals. AEs (38.2% vs 42.5% vs 37.3%) and SAEs (1.8% vs 3.1% vs 2.6%) were comparable between the guselkumab Q4W, guselkumab Q8W, and placebo groups, respectively.

Abbreviations: ACR20/50/70, American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% improvement; AE, adverse event; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; JSN, joint space narrowing; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PASI 90, 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; SAE, serious adverse event; SC, subcutaneous; vdH-S, van der Heijde-Sharp score; W24, Week 24.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content