All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The pso Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the pso Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The pso and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is supported by educational grants. All educational content is developed independently by SES in collaboration with our expert steering committee, with no input or influence from financial supporters. We would like to express our gratitude to the following companies for their support: • UCB: For website development, launch, and ongoing maintenance. • UCB: For educational content and news updates.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

COSMOS: Guselkumab for patients with TNFi-IR in PsA

By Ella Dixon

Share:

Jun 6, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in PsA.


 

Many patients with PsA are treated with TNFis, but a large proportion of patients receiving their first TNFi do not achieve an ACR20 response within 6 months of treatment, requiring further therapies. 

The phase IIIb randomized, placebo-controlled COSMOS study (NCT03796858) was initiated to evaluate the multi-domain effectiveness of guselkumab, an IL-23p19 inhibitor, in patients with PsA and inadequate response to TNFi using various composite indices over 48 weeks (DAPSA, DAS28, PsARC, PASDAS, GRACE, mCPDAI, MDA, and VLDA). 

In total, 285 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive guselkumab (n=189) or placebo (n=96), with the placebo group crossing over to guselkumab at Week 24. Results were published in Oxford Rheumatology by Gossec et al.

 

Key learnings

Guselkumab significantly improved PsA disease activity across all composite indices compared with placebo by Week 24. Improvements increased through Week 48, and >80% of patients who achieved LDA at Week 24 maintained it at Week 48.

Joint-specific indices showed earlier response (as early as Week 4). Lower baseline disease activity predicted better achievement of LDA/remission, and patients with only one prior TNFi responded better than those with two.

Overall, 53% of placebo-randomized patients switched to guselkumab at Week 24. Placebo patients who switched to guselkumab at Week 24 showed similar improvements by Week 48, supporting guselkumab’s consistent efficacy.

In this study, guselkumab was effective across all domains of PsA, including skin, joints, enthesitis, and dactylitis, and was a viable treatment option for patients with PsA and prior TNFi failure. This supports the use of treat-to-target strategies using composite indices in real-world settings.

ACR20, ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria; DAPSA, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis; DAS28, Disease Activity Score 28; GRACE, Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis; IL, interleukin; LDA, low disease activity; mCPDAI, modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index; MDA, minimal disease activity; PASDAS, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; PsARC, Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; VLDA, very low disease activity.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content