All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis content recommended for you
Results from a large, retrospective cohort study comparing adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) between biologic-exposed (n = 1,226) and unexposed (n = 1,238) female patients with psoriasis (PsO) were published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology by Bar et al. The primary outcomes were APOs, including spontaneous abortion, stillbirth or intrauterine fetal death, preterm birth before 37 weeks’ gestation, small for gestational age, low birth weight (≤2,500 g), preeclampsia and eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Key data: Any APO occurred significantly less frequently in biologic-exposed patients vs unexposed controls (24.1% vs 30.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.89; p = 0.0013). Biologic exposure was associated with lower odds of spontaneous abortion (8.40% vs 10.90%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57–0.98; p = 0.0406) and GDM (4.16% vs 7.43%; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38–0.77; p = 0.00054), while rates of all other APOs were similar between groups. APO rates were comparable across biologic classes (p = 0.31) and neonatal outcomes were broadly similar between groups.
Key learning: Biologic therapy in female patients with PsO was not associated with increased risk of APOs compared with unexposed controls, suggesting that adequate disease control during pregnancy may reduce obstetric risk.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content