All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis content recommended for you
Results from the long-term extension of the randomized, phase III SELECT-PsA 1 trial (NCT03104400), evaluating upadacitinib vs adalimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-bDMARD-IR), were published in Rheumatology and Therapy by McInnes et al.
Key data: Of 1,704 patients enrolled in SELECT-PsA 1,983 completed treatment at Week 260. The proportions of patients attaining ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20; 90.3% and 86.6%), ACR50 (71.8% and 71.2%), and ACR70 (47.1% and 48.4%) responses were maintained through Week 260 with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg, respectively, and were generally comparable to adalimumab (86.3%, 66.4%, and 44.7%, respectively). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses at Week 260 were similar between patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, and adalimumab (PASI75, 78.4%, 79.8%, and 85.2%; PASI90, 67.2%, 65.9%, and 71.9%; PASI100, 47.0%, 52.7%, and 51.1%). At Week 260, 58.9%, 62.5%, and 55.0% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, and adalimumab, respectively, demonstrated minimal disease activity (MDA). The safety profile of upadacitinib was consistent with observations at 104 and 152 weeks. Higher rates of herpes zoster, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), creatine kinase (CPK) elevation, and infections were observed with upadacitinib relative to adalimumab. No new safety signals were identified with prolonged upadacitinib treatment.
Key learning: In the 5-year analysis of SELECT-PsA 1, upadacitinib demonstrated sustained efficacy across multiple PsA domains, with a safety profile consistent with that observed throughout the trial. These findings support the long-term benefit–risk profile of upadacitinib in patients with PsA and non-bDMARD-IR.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.