All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. 

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ICONIC-LEAD phase III: Continued vs withdrawn icotrokinra in plaque PsO

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jun 15, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in psoriasis.


Results from the randomized withdrawal period (Week 24–52) of the phase III ICONIC-LEAD study (NCT06095115) assessing maintenance of response with icotrokinra in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) were published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology by Soung et al. Patients who achieved a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) or an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 at Week 24 of treatment with icotrokinra in ICONIC-LEAD were re-randomized to continue receiving icotrokinra (n = 169) or to withdraw from icotrokinra (n = 172). 

Key data: Continued icotrokinra demonstrated superior maintenance of PASI75 (89% vs 30%) and  PASI90 (84% vs 21%) responses at Week 52 vs withdrawal (multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.001). The median time-to-loss-of-response was not reached (NR) for PASI75 or PASI90 in the continued icotrokinra group vs 16.9 weeks and 10.1 weeks, respectively, in the withdrawal group (multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.001). Clear skin (PASI100 and IGA 0) was maintained in 74% of patients continuing icotrokinra vs 10% in the withdrawal group at Week 52 (nominal p < 0.001). No increase in exposure-adjusted adverse event (AE) rates were observed with continued icotrokinra through Week 52. 

Key learning: Continued icotrokinra demonstrated superior and durable maintenance of skin clearance through 52 weeks vs placebo/withdrawal in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO, with a favorable safety profile, supporting its use as a long-term oral treatment option. Prolonged median time-to-loss-of-response among patients who discontinued treatment suggests a durable treatment effect that may persist beyond active icotrokinra therapy. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content