All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The pso Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the pso Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The pso and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported by educational grants. We would like to express our gratitude to the following companies for their support: UCB, founding supporter. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

FDA approves icotrokinra for patients aged ≥12 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Mar 19, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in plaque psoriasis.


On March 18, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved icotrokinra, an oral interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor, for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients (aged ≥12 years who weigh ≥40 kg and are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.1 This approval is based on results from the phase III ICONIC trials, which evaluated icotrokinra in adults and adolescents with plaque psoriasis.1  

As previously reported by the PsOPsA Hub, in the ICONIC-LEAD study (NCT06095115), icotrokinra vs placebo demonstrated greater rates of Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1 (65% vs 8%; p < 0.001) and of ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90; 50% vs 4%; p < 0.001) at Week 16.2 Safety profiles were similar between groups, with nasopharyngitis (7%), upper respiratory tract infection (URTI; 7%), and gastrointestinal (GI) events (6%) being the most common adverse events (AEs) in the icotrokinra group.2 

In the ongoing ICONIC-TOTAL trial (NCT06095102), icotrokinra is being evaluated in adult and adolescent patients with moderate plaque psoriasis affecting special areas, such as scalp, genital, and palmoplantar.1 At Week 16, 57% of patients receiving icotrokinra demonstrated an IGA score of 0/1 vs 6% of patients receiving placebo (p < 0.001).3 Rates of AEs were similar between groups (50% vs 42%) and most commonly included nasopharyngitis and GI events.3  

Results from Week 16 of the ongoing ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 (NCT06143878) and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 (NCT06220604) studies, comparing icotrokinra with deucravacitinib and placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, have previously been reported by the PsOPsA Hub. Higher proportions of patients receiving icotrokinra vs placebo demonstrated an IGA score of 0/1 (ADVANCE 1, 68% vs 11%; ADVANCE 2, 70% vs 9%) and PASI90 (ADVANCE 1, 55% vs 4%; ADVANCE 2, 57% vs 1%) at Week 16.4 The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (icotrokinra, 6%; placebo, 5%) and URTI (icotrokinra, 4%; placebo, 3%).4 

The ICONIC-ASCEND (NCT06934226) study is currently underway, investigating icotrokinra vs placebo and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.1 Additional studies, including ICONIC-PsA 1 (NCT06878404) and ICONIC-PsA 2 (NCT06807424), are in progress to evaluate icotrokinra in active psoriatic arthritis.1 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with plaque psoriasis do you see per month?