The pso Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the pso Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The pso and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The PsOPsA Hub is supported by educational grants. All educational content is developed independently by SES in collaboration with our expert steering committee, with no input or influence from financial supporters. We would like to express our gratitude to the following companies for their support: • UCB: For website development, launch, and ongoing maintenance. • UCB: For educational content and news updates.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View pso content recommended for you
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Question 1 of 1
In a trial by Morita et al., which treatment regimen was most effective for the primary outcome of time to GPP?
A
B
C
D
Dysregulation of interleukin 36 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), which has a highly unpredictable clinical course. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor antibody, is approved for the treatment of flares in adult patients with GPP; however, there are currently no optimal treatments for the prevention of GPP flares.
The Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Hub has previously reported safety results from Effisayil 1 (NCT03782792) assessing spesolimab in patients with GPP presenting with an acute flare. More recently, Morita et al.1 published an article in Lancet reporting results from Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab for the prevention of flares in patients with GPP. Here, we are pleased to present a visual abstract summarizing the key findings.
Key baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*
DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; GPPASI, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; GPPGA, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment; PSS, Psoriasis Symptom Scale. |
||||
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Spesolimab (N = 92) |
Placebo (n = 31) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Low (n = 31) |
Medium (n = 31) |
High (n = 30) |
|
Mean age, years |
38.9 |
42.9 |
40.2 |
39.5 |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
Female |
65 |
65 |
60 |
58 |
Male |
35 |
35 |
40 |
42 |
Mean GPPASI total score |
3.03 |
3.12 |
3.92 |
3.11 |
GPPGA total score |
|
|
|
|
0 |
6 |
26 |
10 |
13 |
1 |
94 |
74 |
90 |
87 |
Mean PSS total core |
4.1 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
3.6 |
Mean DLQI total score |
7.6 |
6.6 |
11.1 |
7.2 |
Concurrent plaque psoriasis† |
32 |
23 |
23 |
32 |
Use of at least one systemic medication (discontinued at randomization) |
81 |
74 |
73 |
71 |
Mean number of previous flares/year |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
Time since first diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
≤1 year |
16 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
>1 to ≤5 years |
19 |
29 |
30 |
32 |
>5 to ≤10 years |
19 |
26 |
27 |
23 |
>10 years |
45 |
32 |
30 |
35 |
The results from this study demonstrated that high-dose spesolimab was superior to placebo and significantly reduced the risk of a GPP flare over 48 weeks. Spesolimab has the potential to shift the clinical management of GPP, leading to improvement in patient’s quality of life.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content