All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis content recommended for you
Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of adalimumab across 17 randomized controlled trials, including 5,655 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), were published in Medicine by Cai et al. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in response (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70, ≥75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75), PASI90, and PASI100 response rates.
Key data: Adalimumab vs placebo demonstrated improvements in ACR20 (risk ratio [RR], 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83–2.83), ACR50 (RR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.98–5.15), and ACR70 (RR, 5.75; 95% CI, 4.47–7.39). Similarly, PASI75 (7.07; 95% CI, 4.36–11.46), PASI90 (4.27; 95% CI, 1.64–11.14), and PASI100 (8.23; 95% CI, 3.89–17.40) were improved with adalimumab vs placebo. No significant increases in overall adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs) were observed. Adalimumab was associated with elevated risk of opportunistic infections (RR, 6.00), raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT; RR, 4.09), raised aspartate aminotransferase (AST; RR, 5.41), neutropenia (RR, 3.62), depression (RR, 3.07), injection site reactions (RR, 1.92), serious infections (RR, 1.69), urinary tract infections (UTIs; RR, 1.45), back pain (RR, 1.32), nausea (RR, 1.23), and death (RR, 1.01).
Key learning: In a meta-analysis of 17 studies, adalimumab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy across joint and skin outcomes in PsA, although a potential signal for elevated liver enzymes was observed. Liver function monitoring may therefore be warranted during treatment.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content