All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The pso Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the pso Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The pso and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported by educational grants. We would like to express our gratitude to the following companies for their support: UCB, for website development, launch, and ongoing maintenance; UCB, for educational content and news updates. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

PSoHO results: Real-world long-term analysis of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jan 14, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in psoriasis.


Results from the international, observational Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) investigation into the comparative effectiveness and durability of biologic treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (N = 1,981) over 24 months were published in Dermatology and Therapy by Pinter et al.

Key data: Patients who received anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics demonstrated higher Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)100 durability rates at 24 months compared with anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biologics (12.2%, 5.5%, 10.7%, and 4.2%, respectively). PASI90 durability rates for anti-IL-17A treatments were superior to anti-IL-12/23 and anti-TNF-α biologics, but similar to anti-IL-23 therapies (26.6%, 12.6%, 9.4%, and 24.8%, respectively). Among the biologics, ixekizumab (Ixe) showed improved PASI100 and PASI90 durability vs secukinumab (Sec), tildrakizumab (Tild), guselkumab (Gus), adalimumab (Ada), and ustekinumab (Ust), with unadjusted response rates for PASI100 durability of 12.6%, 10.4%, 4.2%, 10.2%, 3.5%, and 5.5%, respectively, and similar durability to risankizumab (Ris), which had a PASI100 durability response rate of 13.5%. 

Key learning: Results suggest that anti-IL-17A biologics, particularly Ixe, provide superior long-term effectiveness and durability in achieving and maintaining PASI100 responses in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis over 24 months compared with other classes of biologics, emphasizing the importance of selecting treatments that deliver and maintain skin clearance over extended treatment periods.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with plaque psoriasis do you see per month?