All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The PsOPsA Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the PsOPsA Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The PsOPsA Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The PsOPsA Hub is an independent medical education platform. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis content recommended for you
Results from the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III POETYK PsA-1 (NCT04908202) trial evaluating deucravacitinib in 670 adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were naïve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases by van der Heijde et al. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in response (ACR20) at Week 16.
Key data: At Week 16, the ACR20 response rate was higher with deucravacitinib vs placebo (54.2% vs 34.1%; p < 0.001). ACR20 response rates increased through Week 52 in patients who received deucravacitinib throughout the study (63.1%) and in those who switched from placebo to deucravacitinib at Week 16 (60.8%). At Week 16, response rates for ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75; 51.9% vs 7.1%; p < 0.001) and minimal disease activity (MDA; 19.0% vs 10.2%; p = 0.001) were higher with deucravacitinib vs placebo. In post hoc analyses, radiographic progression was lower with deucravacitinib vs placebo at Week 16 (rank analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], p = 0.009 in the full population). Rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) were comparable between deucravacitinib and placebo at Week 16 (1.8% vs 2.4%) and remained similar through Week 52 between patients who received continuous deucravacitinib and those who switched from placebo at Week 16 (exposure-adjusted incidence rate [EAIR], 8.9 vs 9.0 per 100 patient-years, respectively). No new safety signals related to major adverse cardiac events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE), malignancies, or opportunistic infections were reported.
Key learning: Deucravacitinib demonstrated greater clinical responses than placebo across multiple PsA domains at Week 16, with responses maintained through Week 52 and no new safety signals identified in patients who were bDMARD-naïve.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content